All notes · Consent

Recording consent under Japan's APPI

Japan's privacy law asks for consent at specific moments rather than as a general legal basis. This note covers when it applies, what to show first, and what to keep.

If you come from the GDPR, the first surprise is that Japan's Act on the Protection of Personal Information (APPI) has no menu of lawful bases with consent as one option. Much of the handling of personal information needs no consent at all. The law asks you to specify the purpose of use, keep to it, and notify people of it or publish it1,2.

Consent appears at particular moments instead. At those moments, the law asks for the person's consent in advance.

MomentArticleWhat the law asks
Using personal information beyond the stated purposeArt. 18Prior consent, with listed exceptions1
Acquiring special care-required personal information (medical history, criminal record and similar)Art. 20(2)Prior consent, with listed exceptions1
Providing personal data to a third partyArt. 27Prior consent, with exceptions for entrustment, business succession, joint use, and a notified opt-out route1
Providing personal data to a third party in a foreign countryArt. 28Prior consent, after giving specific information1

Telling people the purpose of use is a separate duty. You notify them or publish it (Art. 21)1. A "consent" checkbox under a privacy policy records that you told them; it is not what these articles ask for.

What to keep

The APPI does not prescribe the format of a consent record. What gets asked later is predictable, though:

  1. Who consented
  2. What they saw when they did (the version of the text)
  3. When they consented
  4. Whether, and when, they withdrew

Keep each version of the text itself. A URL alone won't tell you, a year later, which wording someone agreed to.

Two records are required by law in their own right:

  • Third-party provision. The provider must make a record of each provision (date, recipient and other items) and keep it, generally for three years, or one year when the record is made in certain ways1,3.
  • Marketing email. A sender who receives consent to send advertising email must keep a record proving that consent4.

Children

Who can consent for a child is not fixed by statute under the current law. The PPC's guidance says that the age has to be judged case by case, but that in general, consent should come from a legal representative for children aged roughly 12 to 15 and under5.

Amendments promulgated on 17 July 2026 make the legal representative the person to ask, and to notify, when the individual is under 16. They take effect within two years of promulgation, and the detailed rules are still being written6. Until then, the current guidance applies.

Contract capacity is a different line: the age of majority in Japan is 187. Accepting terms of service and consenting to the handling of personal information can therefore involve different ages.

A consent record is only as good as the link between the person and the text. With Clavis, the product puts the version hash of the text, the purpose, and the recipient into the hash being signed. The user reads a one-line summary, then signs with their passkey. The signature ties that person's passkey to that exact version.

This doesn't make the consent valid or sufficient. It shows who signed which version, and when.

Next

Sources

  1. Act on the Protection of Personal Information (Japanese original, e-Gov) · Checked 2026-10-10
  2. Act on the Protection of Personal Information (English translation, Japanese Law Translation) · Checked 2026-10-10
  3. Enforcement Rules for the Act on the Protection of Personal Information, Article 21 · Checked 2026-10-10
  4. Act on Regulation of Transmission of Specified Electronic Mail, Article 3 · Checked 2026-10-10
  5. PPC Q&A on the APPI Guidelines (Q1-62) · Checked 2026-10-10
  6. PPC, Overview of the 2026 amendments to the APPI · Checked 2026-10-10
  7. Civil Code, Articles 4 and 5 (e-Gov) · Checked 2026-10-10

Colophon

Edition
Edition 1
Published
2026-10-11
Signed
Rin.Natsume · Passkey · 2026-10-11 18:04 UTC · Signature file · Source
Seal
sha256 4v_kD3wN7sTvHpD1RH7_ifqVOaEKSXmuKObEycXdMpY
Publisher
DeepDive, Inc.

The signature shows who stands behind this edition and that the source hasn't changed since it was signed. It does not show that the content is correct.

This is not legal advice. How it applies depends on the facts and the jurisdiction.